The evidence

The 2024 Lancet Commission on dementia, in plain English — and the 14 modifiable risk factors

By Viktor Stevanovic · Published 21 July 2026 · Updated 5 August 2026 · 14 min read

The 2024 Lancet Commission on dementia — a standing group of leading researchers who periodically review the global evidence — estimated that around 45% of dementia cases could, in principle, be prevented or delayed by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors across the course of life. Those factors are: less education, hearing loss, high LDL cholesterol, depression, head injury, physical inactivity, diabetes, smoking, high blood pressure, obesity, excessive alcohol, social isolation, air pollution and untreated vision loss. This is the honest version of what the report actually says — what the 45% means and what it doesn't, what changed in the 2024 update, and what each of the 14 factors looks like in practice, with one thing you can do about each.

What the Lancet Commission actually is

The Lancet is one of the oldest and most respected medical journals in the world. Its Commission on dementia prevention, intervention and care is a standing panel of leading dementia researchers, led by Professor Gill Livingston, who periodically pull together all the available evidence and publish a consensus report. They did so first in 2017, updated it in 2020, and published the latest version in July 2024.

That's worth knowing, because it's why the report carries weight. When people cite "the Lancet Commission," they aren't pointing to a single splashy study or a health headline — they mean an expert consensus that has weighed the whole body of research, argued about it, and put its name to a summary. It's about as close to a settled overview as this field gets.

It also explains why the report keeps changing. Each edition re-examines the evidence rather than restating the last one, which is how the list has grown from nine factors in 2017 to twelve in 2020 to fourteen today. A list that moves is a sign the field is still learning, not a sign it can't be trusted. It also means the list is not the whole field: some of the most-discussed findings to arrive since 2024, including the research linking shingles vaccination to lower dementia risk, sit outside the fourteen and would need a future edition to weigh them.

The headline: "~45% could be prevented or delayed"

Here is the exact claim, and it rewards careful reading. The 2024 report estimates that around 45% of dementia cases worldwide could, in principle, be prevented or delayed by eliminating 14 modifiable risk factors. Three parts of that sentence do a lot of work:

Put plainly: a large share of dementia risk, across whole populations, runs through things people can influence. That is genuinely hopeful, and worth acting on — as long as nobody stretches it into a personal promise.

What "modifiable" actually means

A modifiable risk factor is simply one that can potentially be changed — unlike age or genetics, which cannot. That single word is doing more work than most headlines allow. It is why the Commission's list contains no mention of the two things people worry about most: getting older, and what runs in the family. Those are left off not because they are unimportant — they are the largest drivers of all — but because there is nothing to do about them. The list is deliberately a list of levers.

"Modifiable" also does not mean "easy," and it does not mean "yours alone to fix." Air pollution is modifiable at the level of a city's policy far more than at the level of one household's air filter. Years of education is modifiable for a country's next generation, not for an adult's own childhood. Several factors on this list are as much public-health targets as personal ones, which is part of why the 45% is framed as a population figure.

Two caveats before the list itself. First, having a risk factor does not mean you will develop dementia — these are shifts in odds, not diagnoses. Many people with several risk factors never develop dementia, and some with none do. Second, the factors overlap and compound; they're best thought of as a stack you chip away at over years, not a checklist you clear in a weekend.

What changed in the 2024 update

The 2020 report listed 12 factors and put the figure at about 40%. The 2024 update added two more, bringing the total to 14 factors and the estimate to about 45%:

The 2024 report also reclassified several factors — depression, physical inactivity, smoking and diabetes — from later life into midlife. That's a useful nudge, and arguably the most practical change in the whole update: a lot of the action happens in your 40s, 50s and 60s, not only in old age. It also means midlife is now by far the busiest stage on the list, holding ten of the fourteen factors. (The updated risk shares were recalculated using data from Norway's large HUNT population study.)

The 14 factors, across the life course — and one thing you can do

The Commission organises the factors by when in life they tend to matter most. Below is the full list in that order, in plain English, each with one practical thing a person can do. None of these is a cure, and none guarantees an outcome — they are levers associated with lower risk. You can also explore them interactively in the interactive 14-factor explainer.

Early life

Midlife

Later life

Note what the life-stage grouping is and isn't saying. It marks the period when a factor appears to matter most, not the only window in which it counts. Blood pressure still matters at 75; hearing still matters at 45. The grouping is a hint about where to look first at a given age, not an expiry date.

Which ones you actually control

Look down that list and a pattern appears: almost all of it is checkable and actionable. Age and genetics — the things people worry about most — aren't on it, precisely because they can't be modified. What is on it clusters into a few practical levers:

Two factors sit at the edge of personal control and deserve saying out loud. Early education is fixed by the time anyone reads an article like this — the modifiable part, for an adult, is continued learning rather than schooling already had. And air pollution is largely a matter of where you live and what your city does about it; individual mitigation helps at the margins, but this one is genuinely a public-health lever more than a personal one.

The honest framing is that you influence odds, not certainties. But "influence" is not nothing — it's most of the list.

Why the combination matters more than any single factor

It's tempting to pick the one factor that feels easiest and call it done. The research points the other way: the payoff tends to come from acting on several factors together. The FINGER trial (2015) tested a two-year multidomain programme — diet, exercise, cognitive training and vascular monitoring combined — and found it helped maintain or improve cognition in at-risk older adults compared with a control group. The ACTIVE trial followed older adults for a decade and linked speed-of-processing cognitive training to lower dementia risk. And SPRINT-MIND (2019) found that intensive blood-pressure control reduced the risk of mild cognitive impairment versus standard control.

None of these studies is about a single silver bullet, and none claims prevention or a cure. Read together, they suggest the same thing the Lancet list implies: brain-health risk is spread across many factors, so the most reliable approach is to chip away at several of them steadily rather than betting everything on one.

There is a statistical reason for this too. Because the factors overlap — high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity travel together; hearing loss and social isolation feed each other — their individual percentages cannot simply be added up. That cuts both ways. It means you can't stack the numbers to build your own total, and it means addressing one factor often nudges its neighbours in the same direction.

What the 45% does — and doesn't — mean

Because this number gets stretched in both directions, it's worth being precise about its limits:

None of that undercuts the core message. Across three reports and many years, the evidence keeps pointing the same way: a substantial share of dementia risk is modifiable at the population level. That's a reason for measured optimism and steady action — not fear, and not false hope.

Turning a global number into a personal plan

A worldwide statistic can't tell you what to do on a Tuesday, and fourteen factors is a lot to hold in your head — a generic "do everything" is how good intentions stall. What's actually useful is knowing where you stand across these 14 factors: which ones you've already handled, and which one or two are worth a conversation with your doctor this month. Some will already be fine. Some will need a number you don't currently have, which usually means a simple check rather than a lifestyle overhaul. That's the difference between an interesting report and an actual plan, and it's the whole idea behind mapping your own modifiable factors and watching them change over time.

See where you stand across the 14 modifiable factors — a free, three-minute brain-health risk profile that turns the Lancet Commission's list into your personal priorities.

Get your free risk profile
Common questions

What is the 2024 Lancet Commission on dementia?

It's a report from a standing panel of leading dementia researchers, convened under the journal The Lancet, who periodically review the global evidence on dementia prevention, intervention and care. First published in 2017 and updated in 2020, the 2024 report is the group's latest consensus. It concluded that around 45% of dementia cases could, in principle, be prevented or delayed by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors across the life course.

What are the 14 modifiable risk factors for dementia?

The 2024 Lancet Commission lists less education in early life; hearing loss, high LDL cholesterol, depression, head injury, physical inactivity, diabetes, smoking, high blood pressure, obesity and excessive alcohol in midlife; and social isolation, air pollution and untreated vision loss in later life. It estimates around 45% of dementia cases worldwide are associated with these factors across the life course.

What does "45% of dementia could be prevented or delayed" actually mean?

It's a population-level modelling estimate under ideal conditions, not a personal promise. It reflects what could happen, in principle, if all 14 risk factors were removed from the whole population — which no society will ever fully achieve, so it's a ceiling rather than a forecast. "Prevented or delayed" also matters: reducing risk often means pushing dementia later rather than erasing it. You can't remove 45% of your own risk by ticking boxes, but the figure shows a large share of risk, across populations, runs through things people can influence.

What are the two new risk factors added in 2024?

High LDL cholesterol in midlife and untreated vision loss in later life, bringing the total from 12 to 14. High midlife cholesterol was added on the strength of cohort studies of over a million people plus a genetic meta-analysis, and accounts for about 7% of cases. Untreated vision loss, such as uncorrected cataracts, was added from two large meta-analyses and accounts for about 2%.

Which of the 14 factors can I actually control?

Most of them, at least partly. Hearing, cholesterol, blood pressure, blood sugar, weight, activity, smoking, alcohol, mood, learning, social contact and vision can all be checked and acted on with help from a healthcare professional. Air pollution and early education are the least individually controllable. Age and genetics aren't on the list precisely because they can't be changed. And having a risk factor is not a diagnosis and not a guarantee — these are shifts in odds across populations.

Is it too late to act if I already have some of these factors?

It's rarely too late to act. The Commission describes risk factors across the whole life course, and evidence suggests addressing modifiable factors may help at midlife and later. Earlier is generally better, but acting now beats not acting. Discuss your situation with a qualified healthcare professional.

Sources

How we research and review our content →

This article is educational and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Figures and studies cited describe population-level research from the 2024 Lancet Commission and the trials named, not Solenna. Solenna does not prevent, treat, or cure Alzheimer's disease or any form of dementia; individual results vary and no outcome is guaranteed. If you are concerned about your cognitive health, consult a qualified healthcare professional.